State and local pension accounting
takes a step toward transparency
By Zachary Janowski
July 8, 2011
The way
states and local governments account for pensions is about to change – slowly.
The Governmental Accounting
Standards Board, a nonprofit based in Norwalk, Conn.,
will release a draft of changes to pension accounting rules
Friday. These changes will first affect government balance sheets in fiscal
year 2013.
The most
significant change in the proposal will move unfunded pension liabilities out
of a footnote and onto government balance sheets.
GASB
officials emphasize the new rules won’t change how much states and cities owe –
or how much they have to contribute to their plans – but they will increase
transparency and uniformity.
“The
economic reality is that nothing has changed; it’s the presentation that has
changed,” GASB Chairman Robert Attmore told Stateline recently.
“We would
encourage GASB to implement this tomorrow,” said Sheila Weinberg, founder and
CEO of the Institute
for Truth in Accounting. “Right now if you look at the balance
sheet, the balance sheet is a bogus number.”
Weinberg
said the changes bring “full transparency” to pension liabilities. She said it
took her organization, experts on the subject, a year and a half to determine
that all 50 states combined have more than $500 billion in unfunded
liabilities. After the changes, Weinberg said this information will be more accessible
to legislators and the general public.
“You can’t
make good decisions if you don’t know the right number,” she said.
Under the
current rules, Weinberg said, California
had more assets than liabilities on its balance sheet as recently as 2008. “Obviously,
that’s totally bogus,” she said.
Mark Zehner, an enforcement officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission’s Public Pension unit, told Watchdog.org that the uniformity also will help
his agency better regulate the market.
“The
multitude of options available generates complexity and the ability to hide a
lot of problems,” he said. “In the long term, this (change) is a positive.
We’re bringing to the surface what some of these numbers really mean.”
The GASB
proposal would also:
- Allow only one actuarial method for calculating pension costs
(entry age normal, level percentage of payroll)
- Limit the length of time over which governments can spread pension
costs related to current employees (a weighted average of employees
remaining service period)
- Force pensions to immediately recognize costs or savings caused by
benefit or assumption changes
- Require governments to report their unfunded liabilities calculated
in three different ways: using their chosen discount rate, the discount
rate minus 1 percent and the discount rate plus 1 percent
- Implement a new, blended discount rate for pension plans that
expect to run out of assets
- Include ad hoc cost of living adjustments – or COLAs – in pension
liabilities if the COLAs are essentially automatic
GASB first
mandated the reporting of pension liabilities in 1997. It more recently
required governments to report their retiree health care liabilities, known as
other post-employment benefits or OPEB.
Unions and
other supporters of public pensions have blamed GASB’s
rules for recent efforts to replace public employee pensions with
defined-contribution plans, similar to private sector 401(k) plans.
The public
will have 90 days to comment on GASB’s proposal,
called an exposure draft. The board expects to finalize the changes by June 15,
2012.
John Bury,
an actuary who serves private-sector clients and blogs about pensions,
said the changes are an attempt to increase the annual required contribution,
or ARC, but he doesn’t see the point when many governments don’t contribute the
full amount anyway.
“If you give
them a number of $5 billion and they put in $2 billion, what are you going to
do, give them a number of $6 billion so they can put in $2 billion,” he said.
The Pew Center on the States has reported findings
similar to Weinberg’s institute. State pensions around the country, according
to Pew, have $2.28 trillion in assets set aside to pay $2.94 trillion in
promised benefits, leaving an unfunded liability of $660 billion.
Both Weinberg
and Pew collected information reported by state governments to arrive at their
numbers. Many financial economists question the assumptions used by states,
saying they drastically underreport their liabilities.
Joshua Rauh, an
associate professor of finance at the Kellogg School of Management at
Northwestern University, estimates the total unfunded liability of all 50
states is actually $2.5 trillion.
The
difference between Rauh’s estimate and the numbers
reported by state governments is the discount rate. GASB allows states to use
their expected rate of return as the discount rate for future payments, while
financial economists like Rauh argue those rates are
arbitrary and too high.
This article
is continued at http://www.raisinghale.com/2011/07/08/state-and-local-pension-accounting/